Editing Openai/69557275-0da8-8004-a03a-8eb02e10a61f (section)

=== User: This is a start, and there's some really good thinking here about trends. ===
This is a start, and there's some really good thinking here about trends. So I think this is analytically robust. It's not yet interesting. So go back to the very prompt that started this entire conversation and look at the example 14 predictions, and look at how those were a lot more show rather than tell, a lot more phenomenological, a lot more sensory, in that people could immediately get how those things impact their lives, not by being told in words, but by seeing an example. And so I'd like to invite you to rework your list to make it more interesting. And I suspect that that will be a mix of keeping some of the ones that you currently have on the list, but making them, again, more embodied, more show-don't-tell, and then adding, because you have a lot of back-end infrastructural things, which are fine, but they're more like the sorts of things we would put in a corporate white paper. What I want is to really pull all the way through to how this is going to show up in the lives of people, in their lives, at work, but not as things happening in back-end infrastructure as a truth in itself. It needs to be the experiential, you know, what the world is going to be like to live in. And so I think what you're probably going to do is take some of these and recast them, maybe lump a couple of them together, and then add some more different ones, which you haven't thought about. So take your time, think about it, and come up with your best list, and then go back, and really, you're not doing a good job right now. You don't need to capture the exact voice, but you're not capturing the essence of the original 14 predictions. So go back, reread that a couple of times, really think about it, and then try to write something like it that is what it's missing.