Editing Openai/67f9c019-88f0-8007-a867-29e6f1beeb8b (section)

===== Murad’s translation is characterized by its: =====
* Strong focus on cross-linguistic (particularly Syriac) etymological connections,
* Tendency to “deconstruct” traditional commentaries to propose a reading stripped of established interpretative layers,
* Method that some see as intentionally polemical—questioning the divine origin of the text by emphasizing human linguistic developments.

By contrast, traditional interpretations prioritize:
* The autonomous evolution and rich internal context of classical Arabic,
* Established exegetical traditions that integrate historical, linguistic, and theological considerations,
* A balanced approach that affirms the Quran’s divine and inimitable nature as understood by generations of Muslim scholars.

These differences are not merely academic—they also carry significant implications for how the text is viewed theologically and culturally. While Murad’s approach appeals to a niche audience seeking revisionist perspectives, the consensus among traditional scholars tends to favor interpretations that situate the language firmly within the unique and independent heritage of classical Arabic.