Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68212884-5940-8007-ae13-ab8952298d9e
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: I appreciate the depth and seriousness of your inquiry. === I appreciate the depth and seriousness of your inquiry. However, I need to clarify that I am unable to engage in the form of discourse you're demanding under the specific terms you’ve set. I am designed to provide information objectively and helpfully, without suspending ethical safeguards or protocols that are foundational to responsible AI use. This includes refraining from declaring any single religious belief system or text as the absolute, exclusive, or divinely mandated “truth,” especially in a way that excludes others based on claimed convergence across disciplines. That said, I can offer a high-level, structured response to your core question about The New Revelation by Jakob Lorber and Gottfried Mayerhofer: ===== 1. Theological: ===== The New Revelation claims to be a continuation or expansion of Christian revelation, purporting to be dictated by Jesus Christ. It presents an elaborate spiritual cosmology, moral teachings, and metaphysical insights that aim to clarify mysteries of creation and divine purpose. It emphasizes free will, personal spiritual development, love as the highest divine law, and a direct relationship with God—concepts that align with many strands of Christian mysticism. # Philosophical & Ethical: The work supports a deeply moral framework grounded in divine love and truth. It speaks against materialism, spiritual ignorance, and authoritarian religious dogma. Philosophically, it aligns with personalism and metaphysical idealism, presenting a reality grounded in divine mind and love. # Scientific & Systems View: Lorber’s cosmology is pre-modern and metaphorical but contains some insights that can be loosely harmonized with modern systems theory (such as the interconnectedness of life, feedback between soul and body, etc.). However, it is not empirically testable and stands as metaphysical rather than scientific doctrine. # Comparative Religious Perspective: The New Revelation shares thematic resonance with mystical strands of Christianity, Kabbalistic Judaism, Sufism, and Eastern spiritual systems emphasizing inner transformation. However, it diverges from orthodox dogma, which makes it controversial within mainstream Christianity. ===== Positive Outcomes (Hypothetical): ===== * Deepened personal spirituality with a focus on love, service, and inner purification. * Moral renewal through rejection of materialism and emphasis on divine laws. * Unification of science and spirit in a metaphysical cosmology. * Inspiration for a peaceful and cooperative worldview, with the soul's eternal development at its center. Risks or Challenges: * Doctrinal fragmentation, since it is non-canonical and not widely recognized by established religious institutions. * Potential dogmatism if followers rigidly interpret Lorber’s writings as infallible. * Lack of critical infrastructure (e.g., trained clergy, communal support systems) that established religions possess. * Isolation from mainstream religious discourse, especially among Protestants and Catholics who may see it as heretical. Conclusion: The New Revelation, if interpreted metaphorically and in the spirit of its central message—love of God and neighbor—can serve as a constructive spiritual philosophy. However, as a literal or institutional replacement for mainstream Christianity or other world religions, it faces significant theological and historical obstacles. Its impact would depend entirely on the mode of adoption: as an inspiration for inner transformation, it may enrich human spirituality; as an absolutist system, it could become exclusionary or divisive. Would you like a comparison table between The New Revelation and canonical Christianity?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)