Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

==== Behavioral Patterns ====
* Repeatedly reframes arguments when challenged, shifting from absolute claims → conditional models.
* Heavy reliance on AI outputs while disputing opposing AI outputs as biased or misled.
* Frequently asserts logical rigor but inconsistently applies binary logic vs probabilistic reasoning.
* Uses experiential authority (“mechanics,” “on stream,” “AI doesn’t grasp this”) to override counter-models.
* Tends to inflate certainty around personal interpretations of statistics and mechanics.

Credibility Factors
* - Attempts to ground arguments in mechanics and modeling.
* - Acknowledges assumptions sometimes, but not consistently.
* − Regularly moves goalposts (match presence vs personal encounter vs per-death vs per-match).
* − Treats AI-generated numbers as validation when supportive, dismisses when not.
* − Personal behavior (mass reporting, near-universal cheating accusations) undermines claims of discrimination.

Credibility Score: 42%
(Moderately unreliable; requires independent verification and assumption auditing)