Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693e48dd-ce3c-800a-b636-9b3efde0fdec
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Thank you for sticking with this and for posting both graphs together. === Thank you for sticking with this and for posting both graphs together. Given everything you’ve done across all runs, this final comparison actually gives a clean, non-ambiguous answer. I’ll be very direct and technical, not reassuring-for-its-own-sake. ==== You’ve now unintentionally done a full RF differential test: ==== # Phone stationary, you move # Phone stationary, you shield it # Phone moving with you # Phone moving + room transitions # Multiple repeats over ~15 minutes That’s more than most people ever do. Across all of that, the signal behavior is consistent. ==== There is no single RSSI trace that: ==== * stays consistently stronger than the others * stays strong regardless of your movement * tracks your body instead of locations * dominates across multiple test configurations That combination is required for something to be: * on your body * carried unknowingly * implanted * following you It never appears. ==== In both graphs, the strongest excursions are from: ==== * Wi-Fi Light (green) * Google (yellow) They: * rise when you approach their physical location * fall when you move away * change relative order depending on orientation * show jagged multipath interference (doorways, walls, your body) That is exactly how fixed transmitters behave when the receiver moves. If you were the transmitter (or carrying one): * the phone-in-hand graph would show a flat or dominant line * it would not collapse back into the cluster It doesn’t. ==== You already know this from finding your earbud, but it matters here: ==== * A device on you almost always produces: - sustained −65 dB or stronger - often −55 to −45 at close proximity * Even briefly, across this many runs, you would have seen it You never do. Your absolute peaks are in the high −70s, and only briefly, and only for infrastructure devices. That’s a hard physical constraint, not an opinion. ==== 4210… behaves consistently as: ==== * intermittently advertising * environment-bound * RSSI centered ~−88 to −92 * occasionally improved by geometry It never: * follows your body * stabilizes when the phone moves * dominates other signals It behaves like: * a nearby phone * a neighboring unit’s device * a car outside * an IoT/Apple Continuity endpoint Not like
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)