Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

=== User: You are doing a very good job, I like the idea of  “spherical boundary → area → rates” Newton's gravity is relative to … ===
You are doing a very good job, I like the idea of  “spherical boundary → area → rates” Newton's gravity is relative to area within the Inverse Square Law! I just want to put an idea forward. In QAT light is a particle and a wave, as a process of energy exchange. The particle nature forms a probabilistic future. The wave characteristic forms gravity as a secondary process to QM. In Huygens's principle, all points on a spherical wave front of light have the same phase. Therefore, the two-dimensional curvature of the wave front can work in unison forming the vibrations need for this process to form gravity. Within such a process, light radiating out from each object or life form creates an Arrow of Time within that reference frame. This forms gravity and inertia as secondary processes relative to the energy and momentum of their actions with the Planck h/2π constant being a constant of action. No 'action at a distance' because the process is never at absolute zero. all objects radiate spherical EM waves. I have been going through my notes: (Robert Hooke speculated in 1671 that gravitation is the result of all bodies emitting waves in all directions through the aether. Other bodies, which interact with these waves, move in the direction of the source of the waves. Hooke saw an analogy to the fact that small objects on a disturbed surface of water move to the center of the disturbance.) In this theory the 'aether' is all bodies emitting electromagnetic waves in all directions.  A similar theory was worked out mathematically by James Challis from 1859 to 1876. He calculated that the case of attraction occurs if the wavelength is large in comparison with the distance between the gravitating bodies. If the wavelength is small, the bodies repel each other. By a combination of these effects, he also tried to explain all other forces. Criticism: Maxwell objected that this theory requires a steady production of waves, which must be accompanied by an infinite consumption of energy. In QAT it would be an exchange of energy. What is very interesting is this: Lord Kelvin (1871) and Carl Anton Bjerknes (1871) assumed that all bodies pulsate in the aether. This was in analogy to the fact that, if the pulsation of two spheres in a fluid is in phase, they will attract each other; and if the pulsation of two spheres is not in phase, they will repel each other. This mechanism was also used for explaining the nature of electric charges. Among others, this hypothesis has also been examined by George Gabriel Stokes and Woldemar Voigt. The criticism to this idea is: To explain universal gravitation, one is forced to assume that all pulsations in the universe are in phase—which appears very implausible. In addition, the aether should be incompressible to ensure that attraction also arises at greater distances. And Maxwell argued that this process must be accompanied by a permanent new production and destruction of aether. If we look at these criticisms based on the ideas of QAT, all points on a local spherical wave front interaction have the same phase. The process would be incompressible, because it is based on the geometry of the Inverse Square Law.  The problem of 'permanent new production and destruction of aether' can be explained by the continuous exchange of photon energy. I believe this is the way forward, what do you think? Be critical and take as long as you need!