Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6973e373-2b8c-800d-84b7-d7001cfc6bac
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== I’m splitting the reply into distinct claims/arguments (some are factual/descriptive, some are normative, some are “burden of proof” moves). ==== ===== B1. “It’s more than just a ‘sub-reddit post.’” ===== * Claim: Greg is using the wrong frame/genre for judging it; it isn’t meant to be treated like an ordinary casual Reddit post. B2. “It’s a full guide… pinned… for that reason.” * Claim bundle: - B2a: It’s a full guide. - B2b: It contains important context needed to engage productively. - B2c: It’s a starting place for newcomers. - B2d: It is pinned at the top specifically because it serves those functions. ===== B3. “Your not wanting to read the entire thing is not an everyone problem… you’re the first person to have an issue with it in this way.” ===== * Claim: Greg’s complaint is personal/atypical, not a general design flaw. B4. “If you don’t want to read it all at once… save/bookmark and finish later.” * Claim: There’s a practical workaround; the length isn’t inherently disqualifying. B5. “If posts weren’t meant to be this long… they would have made the maximum… shorter (this falls just under the maximum).” * Argument: Platform constraints imply that long posts are within intended/allowed use; therefore “too long” is less compelling as a criticism. ===== B6. “If you don’t know what is doing the ‘drowning,’ then you can’t really say it’s not justified… and if you do know… say what specifically doesn’t need to be in the guide.” ===== * Argument: Greg’s critique is either (a) insufficiently specified, or (b) should be specified so it can be evaluated. ===== B7. “‘What is AI Therapy?’ is just the first of many topics… which is why it starts off with saying there’s much more…” ===== * Claim: Greg’s “first half” framing misses that the post is intentionally broad and multi-topic. ===== B8. “Thanks for the critique of the part you were able to get through.” ===== * Not really an argument; it functions as a polite (slightly pointed) acknowledgement.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)