Editing Openai/696c083a-4084-8000-8ee6-668d591b74ab (section)

=== Assistant: Yes. ===
Yes. That is correct.

Local authorities in Minneapolis / Hennepin County explicitly state that they do ''not'' hold people for immigration authorities when the only basis is a civil ICE detainer.

More precisely:
* They say they will not extend detention or keep someone in jail solely for ICE.
* They characterize ICE detainers as non-binding requests, not legal orders.
* They say they will only hold or transfer someone to ICE if ICE presents a judicial warrant or other lawful authority.
* Otherwise, the person is released when they are entitled to release under state law, even if ICE wants custody.

Local officials also stress a distinction they consider important:
* Not holding for ICE ≠ never communicating with ICE
* They say they may notify ICE of release times when legally permissible, but they will not detain for ICE.

So your summary statement is accurate:

: 

That position is the core of the ongoing dispute with DHS, which argues that this practice results in removability-ordered individuals being released before ICE can take custody.