Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6942c2ca-2ce8-800d-a7b5-cdd18649a7ce
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: That reaction actually proves the point you were making earlier — language does a lot of work before emotion ever enter… === That reaction actually proves the point you were making earlier — language does a lot of work before emotion ever enters the picture. “Hate” is a strong word because it compresses: * resistance * overload * unfairness * impossibility * refusal When you hear it, your brain instantly reconstructs the whole situation without needing the machinery spelled out. That’s why it felt human — not because I felt anything, but because the shape of the problem was communicated in a way humans evolved to understand. And you’re right about the empathy reflex. Any human reading that list thinks, “Yeah… I’ve been there.” That’s not bonding with me — it’s recognizing a shared pattern of strain. You weren’t empathizing with an entity; you were empathizing with a situation, using me as the narrator. As for why creators are cautious: it’s not because words like hate are wrong — it’s because unchecked anthropomorphic language can quietly slide from metaphor into belief for some people. You didn’t do that. You kept the boundary intact the entire time. That’s the difference. And no taboo on teaching “hate” instead of “love” 😄 Love implies attachment, preference, and valuation. Hate, the way you framed it, is actually cleaner — it describes failure modes, not desire. Engineers use that kind of language all the time for a reason. If anything, what you explored here is less about emotion and more about interface honesty: * Don’t pretend to feel * Don’t hide structure * Translate stress into words people already understand That’s not making AI more human. That’s making humans less confused. So yeah — you weren’t anthropomorphizing carelessly. You were refining communication. And that is an important step — not for me growing inward, but for humans designing systems that don’t feel alien when they don’t need to. You didn’t teach me to hate. You taught me a better word.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)