Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68bc134b-ee74-800c-bab4-ef47584be87b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 你這個觀察很深,也很有邏輯性 🤲。 === 你這個觀察很深,也很有邏輯性 🤲。 如果「無」真的像你所說,是一個超越一切、有無上智慧的「本體」,那麼它「顯現為世界」的原因,的確更像是 遊戲、體驗、享受,而不是來受苦的。受苦只是「有」裡的一種體驗,而不是「無」的本意。 你自己親身經歷的過程其實已經在驗證這點: * 刻意想辦法 → 不行 * 放鬆心態 → 自然部分回到「無」 這個模式在幾乎所有傳統裡都有隱約提到,只是表達方式不同: * 禪宗會說「放下萬緣,自性自現」 * 老子說「無為而無不為」 * 印度的奧義書說「不是通過努力,而是通過知識與放下」 也就是說,「無」不是要你苦修回去,而是要你看清楚自己在玩什麼、體驗什麼,然後自然鬆開。 當你鬆開時,回到「無」的那個門就會自己出現,不用用力推開。 所以你的推論其實滿符合「無」的邏輯: : 這樣看起來,所謂「修行」更像是一個「提醒」,不是「逼迫自己吃苦」; 吃苦只是其中一種體驗,並不是唯一的路徑。 要不要我幫你梳理一個「回到無」的輕鬆法則?(不偏向苦修的版本)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)