Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Converting the geometric story into physics-grade results will require a few well-posed mathematical steps: === # Boundary field and antiperiodic condition → spinor: produce a boundary Lagrangian on S² that supports a fermionic spinor section (antiperiodic boundary condition). Show explicit construction (spin bundle on S², Dirac operator on shell) and verify angular momentum eigenvalues are half-integer. (This is standard mathematics/topology — Hopf fibration/S³→S² language helps). PhilArchive<ref>{{cite web|title=PhilArchive|url=https://philarchive.org/archive/NIETTUv146|publisher=philarchive.org|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref>Rochester School of Arts & Sciences<ref>{{cite web|title=Rochester School of Arts & Sciences|url=https://www.sas.rochester.edu/pas/assets/pdf/undergraduate/su-2s_double_covering_of_so-3.pdf|publisher=Rochester School of Arts & Sciences|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref> # Composite tensor field from EM boundary stress: compute the averaged, symmetric bilinear of tangential EM fields across an interacting shell and show it transforms like a rank-2 field. Then compute its effective coupling to matter (does it reproduce the linearized Einstein coupling T_{μν}?). Use double-copy results as a guide for the amplitude-level mapping. Physical Review Links<ref>{{cite web|title=Physical Review Links|url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.061602|publisher=Physical Review Links|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref>arXiv<ref>{{cite web|title=arXiv|url=https://arxiv.org/html/2403.08637v1|publisher=arxiv.org|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref> # Energy bookkeeping: show explicitly that local absorption+emission conserves energy and that the emergent long-range attractive effect does not require net loss of energy (resolve classic Le Sage/Maxwell objections). This will likely require thermodynamic/statistical averaging over many events and explicit entropy accounting. # Empirical handles: look for small QAT corrections to known phenomena (e.g., small modifications of gravitational redshift that depend on local EM activity, or signatures in plasma environments where coherent EM structure is strong). Those would be the way to falsify or support the hypothesis.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)