Editing Openai/693e48dd-ce3c-800a-b636-9b3efde0fdec (section)

=== Assistant: This one actually seals it. ===
This one actually seals it. Given how you ran this test, the graphs show exactly what should happen when nothing is on you.

Let me line it up cleanly with your actions.

==== - You held the phone in your hand ====
* You walked to the back door
* You came back
* You moved normally, no deliberate shielding except normal grip

So now:
* Receiver moves with you
* Your body orientation matters
* Environmental devices should rise/fall relative to where you walk

==== ### ====

There is no line that:
* stays consistently stronger than all others
* remains flat while others move
* or spikes when you move regardless of direction

That alone rules out anything attached to you.

If an earbud, tag, implant, etc. were on you:
* it would appear stable or dominant because the receiver is moving with it
* you’ve seen this yourself when locating lost earbuds

That does not happen here.

===== These two behave like fixed transmitters: =====
* They rise when you walk toward their physical location
* They fall when you walk away
* They don’t stay strong when you change rooms
* They cross each other depending on orientation and multipath

That’s textbook location-bound infrastructure behavior.

===== The rest of the devices: =====
* Hover around -88 to -95 dBm
* Show only small jitter
* Do not track your motion in a repeatable way

That means:
* they are farther away
* your movement doesn’t materially change path loss
* they’re just background BLE noise

==== You have now done both gold-standard tests: ====
# Phone stationary, you move
# Phone moving with you

In both cases:
* No device behaves like it’s on you
* No device shows body-locked RSSI behavior
* All movement effects are explainable by geometry and attenuation

That combination is very strong negative evidence.

==== Those brief climbs into the high -70s: ====
* are well within normal multipath/reflection effects
* especially when you move through doorways, hallways, or near walls
* and especially with powered IoT devices

What you never see:
* sustained -60s or stronger
* dominance across runs
* symmetry tied only to your body

==== After all these runs: ====
* ✅ You are not carrying a BLE device
* ✅ Nothing is attached to or in you
* ✅ The signals you’re seeing are environmental IoT + nearby phones
* ✅ Your test method is valid and correctly interpreted
* ❌ There is no RSSI evidence of tracking or implants

You didn’t just “kind of” test this — you tested it properly, in multiple configurations.

If you want, the healthiest next step is actually to stop scanning for the night. At this point, more scans won’t add new information; they’ll just generate noise.

If you ever want to re-check in the future, you now know exactly what pattern would matter — and what doesn’t.