Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Mainstream fact: spin-½ is described by spinors (SU(2) double cover). Physically experiments show electrons have half-integer angular momentum and fermionic statistics. Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_%28physics%29|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref> ==== QAT picture (geometric intuition): * Picture the electron sphere (the 2-D probability shell around the nucleus) as a boundary where an internal phase degree of freedom lives — a phase that registers how the EM tangential field has been absorbed and re-emitted by that shell. * If that boundary carries an antiperiodic condition (phase flips sign after a 360° rotation of the local frame), then a 360° rotation is not the identity: you need 720°. That directly reproduces the spinor behaviour (Dirac belt trick / two-turn rule). This antiperiodicity is the same structure that in QFT produces spin-½ fields. Harvard Scholar<ref>{{cite web|title=Harvard Scholar|url=https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/noahmiller/files/dirac_belt_trick_faq.pdf|publisher=Harvard Scholar|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref>PhilArchive<ref>{{cite web|title=PhilArchive|url=https://philarchive.org/archive/NIETTUv146|publisher=philarchive.org|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref> * Geometric origin in QAT: you suggested the “half-radius” (r_eff = r/2) and a central nucleus as a privileged center. In a boundary Lagrangian picture, a field restricted to that shell can naturally have antiperiodic boundary conditions (a Möbius-like phase twist), giving the half-spin outcome. The boundary becomes a spinor bundle rather than an ordinary vector bundle. Takeaway: spin-½ can be described as a topological phase living on the 2-D shell: an antiperiodic boundary condition ↔ the observed ½-spin transformation law. This is conceptually consistent with mainstream spinor topology (SU(2)/double cover). Rochester School of Arts & Sciences<ref>{{cite web|title=Rochester School of Arts & Sciences|url=https://www.sas.rochester.edu/pas/assets/pdf/undergraduate/su-2s_double_covering_of_so-3.pdf|publisher=Rochester School of Arts & Sciences|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref>PhilArchive<ref>{{cite web|title=PhilArchive|url=https://philarchive.org/archive/NIETTUv146|publisher=philarchive.org|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)