Editing Openai/691702f2-d5e0-800f-a971-e994d373929f (section)

=== User: So, people can identify to be whatever they want to be according to me but the society shouldn't fall in line with that… ===
So, people can identify to be whatever they want to be (according to me) but the society shouldn't fall in line with that, because it will break down society and break objective truth (you know what we just talked about)

There are factual differences between male and females, and male are more aggressive and negotiate more for higher pay, push their bosses, push for better positions of power, maybe even say/do stuff to hurt others so competition is removed. This is not insitutionalized and can't be fixed at a state/government level, its just a fact and is based on those particular individuals. And those with those tendencys are also more probable to be of higher power, just BECAUSE of that. Alot of "weaker" males are pushed to the sides by stronger, more dominant and agressive males.

I would argue, if you would put a layer of say "government funded pay" to "buff" womens pay, it will not do anything long term other than churning out tax money stright into enterprises pockets, because now the bosses know that they can get away with less because like you said "women are more agreeable on avarage". And it would work kind of like how tips are given at restaurants in USA, the boss give a low pay and the tips take the salary up to being "agreeable".

Women that has the elbow grease to get to the top should get there, but i think most don't want to be there because it is messy, hard and you get ruffled around (metaphorically speaking). On avarage women try to avoid confrontation not induce it, and more so than avarage men. 

But sometimes it HAS to be done, which is probably a reason why this unagreeable person jordan B peterson is a male and not a female. Not saying he would be a women if he didn't say these things, but it's pretty obvious that somone with the balls to challenge everything is a man. Which is also the reason why i think men have ruled most, because they are not afraid to take the horn of the bull and hold tirelessly, while a women would've falled in line way back, because she stood 1 against 1000 others.