Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6932ecc5-e634-8011-b64a-a4afcb30497a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== SOUTH AMERICA ==== ===== 9. Buen Vivir / Sumak Kawsay – Living well together (Andean, especially Ecuador/Bolivia) ===== Core idea “Good living” is not individual wealth accumulation but harmonious life within community and nature; it rejects unlimited growth as the only metric. FOW connections * KPIs for work – Move from pure productivity to a portfolio of wellbeing metrics: ecological footprint of workplaces, community impact, repair time, generativity of work (does it leave things better?). * Corporate role in cities – Offices as good neighbors: shared amenities with surrounding community, co-programmed spaces for local groups, regeneration of urban fabric instead of gated corporate islands. * Sustainability – Net-zero offices not as compliance, but as expression of Buen Vivir: you cannot claim to be a great place to work while eroding the environmental conditions your workers need to live. ===== 10. Minga – Collective work for the common good (Andes) ===== Core idea Community members volunteer labor to build or repair something for shared benefit—roads, irrigation, houses—often with food, music, and ritual. FOW connections * Employee participation – Treat big workplace or process changes as minga moments: people help design, test, and implement, rather than having new systems dropped on them. * Culture-building – Periodic “build days” where staff step out of normal roles to improve the shared environment: reorganize a floor, replant an outdoor area, co-create new collaboration zones. * Ownership – When people literally help build the workplace, both physically and procedurally, they’re more likely to care for it and evolve it. ===== 11. Mutirão – Collective mutual-help work (Brazil) ===== Core idea Neighbors come together to build or fix homes and infrastructure, usually without monetary exchange—similar to minga but deeply embedded in Brazilian urban and rural life. FOW connections * Mutual aid inside organizations – Go beyond formal HR benefits to peer-led support structures: skill-sharing, care networks, internal time banks where people can “bank” extra effort to receive help later. * Space as commons – Treat parts of the workplace as co-governed commons (kitchens, terraces, project labs) where teams maintain, modify, and program the space, instead of everything being centrally controlled by corporate RE/FMs. * Onboarding & inclusion – Use mutirão-style activities for new teams or new hires: building something together as a fast track to belonging, not just passive orientation sessions. ===== 12. Horizontalidad – Horizontalism & assemblies (Argentina, broader Latin America) ===== Core idea After Argentina’s 2001 crisis, many worker collectives and neighborhood assemblies adopted non-hierarchical decision-making: rotation of roles, open assemblies, and consensus-seeking processes. FOW connections * Org structure – Elements of self-management (distributed authority, clear domains, transparent information) as an antidote to brittle hierarchies in fast-changing environments. * Decision spaces – Regular open assemblies (in-person and virtual) where anyone can raise issues or propose changes—especially about working conditions, equity, or the use of AI. * Workplace typology – Less emphasis on huge executive floors and more on mixed, shared “neighbourhoods” where leaders are spatially embedded with teams; symbolic and practical erosion of classed space.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)