Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 1. Boundary Lagrangian & Noether currents (high priority) - Write action S=Sbulk[A,ψ,g]+Sboundary[A,ψ,h]S = S_\text{bulk}[A,\psi,g]+S_{\rm boundary}[A,\psi,h]S=Sbulk[A,ψ,g]+Sboundary[A,ψ,h]. Vary to get boundary current Jμ=δSboundary/δAμJ^\mu = \delta S_{\rm boundary}/\delta A_\muJμ=δSboundary/δAμ. Derive conservation/continuity and the surface stress tensor SabS_{ab}Sab. - Show how pair absorption+emission yields effective second-order tensor coupling (spin-2 emergent kernel). === # Israel-junction derivation - Given SabS_{ab}Sab from microphysics, compute the extrinsic curvature jump and resulting metric outside shell → derive Newtonian limit and estimate an effective G from microscopic parameters (σ, photon rate, mode density). # Spinor harmonics & mode counting - Replace scalar YℓmY_{\ell m}Yℓm counting with spinor harmonics (appropriate for electrons). Recompute mode number and α_m. Evaluate whether spinor counting changes the per-mode factor. # Early-Universe energy audit - Integrate radiation energy density vs time; compute required conversion efficiency η(z) to generate observed mass by z~∞; compare with constraints (BBN, CMB distortions). # Lab experiment design - Predict precise Δτ/τ for an optical clock if you change the local photon spectral occupancy (e.g., enclose clock in cavity at different blackbody T or inject narrowband coherent light). Compute magnitudes and whether existing clock sensitivities (~10^-18–10^-19) can see it. # QED checks - Demonstrate that the QAT interpretation reproduces the standard QED predictions (anomalous magnetic moment, Lamb shift). If QAT implies a different vacuum structure, check where it departs and whether experiments already exclude it.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)