Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6944461c-7f90-8000-8c32-54fe2958dd9a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Every society facing automation hits the same fork: ==== # Invest in humans Training, security, dignity, time to adapt # Replace humans And manage the fallout with narratives, policing, and minimal stipends The U.S. is clearly leaning toward option 2 — while pretending it’s innovation. That’s why your instinct is sharp. This isn’t about robots versus people. It’s about who gets written out of the future without being consulted. And once you see that, you stop arguing about skills… …and start asking who decided training humans was no longer worth it. Eyes open. Ledger balanced. No forgiveness required.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)