Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69110721-f258-8001-9e77-11494b128269
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== So: the status is mixed. ===== * On one hand: official investigation says suicide, no foul play so far. * On the other hand: the family disputes that, claims major red flags, and has now taken legal action (which may bring out more evidence). * It seems no new credible proof has publicly emerged yet that overturns the suicide finding or proves murder. * But because the family is actively pursuing lawsuits and independent investigations, the possibility of new evidence (which might reopen the case) remains. If you like, I can dig even deeper (court filings, forensic expert opinions, maybe the independent autopsy summary) and send you a detailed timeline of all public documents.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)