Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: I don't feel we have a detailed or conceptual picture yet. === I don't feel we have a detailed or conceptual picture yet. Could the atoms represent sinks in the EM field, this could be represented as the time dilation of relativity? Therefore, if the EM waves are absorbed proportionally to the masses within the bodies, a stream arises and carries all surrounding bodies into the direction of the central mass. I have read that atoms are mostly empty space, therefore the waves could penetrate matter with all of matter being part of this process. I believe the absorption of a spin-1 photon and the emission of a spin-1 photon forming a spin-2 field required for General Relativity is part of the process. I am missing some, that links everything together. Even the 1/2 spin electron is part of this gravitational formation. The photon electron are part of one process when the waves are absorbed and reemitted. Link to my video: Quantum Mechanical Mass mechanism ~ Why Mass increases. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcOM23u_UH8 In this theory Mass increases with speed, because Photon βE=hf energy is continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic energy of matter in the form of electrons. At low speed kinetic energy is one-half the mass times the velocity squared Eβ=Β½mvΒ², but at higher speed the curve for increasing energy starts to look just like the curve for increasing Mass. Is this statement about mass true could mass be emergent? There is the equivalence principle between gravity and acceleration. We have the Law on inertia: An object will have inertia in the direction of motion and will want to continue moving in that direction forever, if not acted upon be an external force. It seems logical that the same process that forms gravitation also forms inertia. Could the process be quantized energy exchange forming wave mechanics? Could you do a deep Critical Analysis into this, using the vast amount of information we have?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)