Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

==== - “v² because spherical geometry” — v² in Ek=12mv2E_k=\tfrac12 m v^2Ek=21mv2 is a kinematic fact (energy scales ∝ (length/time)^2). Spherical geometry gives squared area r2r^2r2 and flux ∝1/r^2; both are squares but come from different physical dimensional reasons. The unifying route would be to show a mapping that takes boundary area elements (∝r^2) to effective kinematic variables in the emergent 3D interior — that is precisely the mathematical program I outlined above (action on the shell → effective inertial terms in the interior). ====
* “Photon and electron are two parts of same geometrical process” — this statement is an interpretive (ontological) claim that can be expressed technically by coupling fields on a boundary: treated as two excitations of the same boundary manifold, yes — write the joint boundary action and quantize it; you’ll get coupled photon/electron mode structure. That’s how to make it precise.
* “Conservation of energy, momentum, charge … linear nature of time” — conservation laws come from symmetries (Noether). For QAT: energy conservation ↔ time-translation invariance of the whole (including boundary), charge conservation ↔ U(1) invariance on boundary + bulk. Making those symmetries explicit in the action is straightforward and is the right way to anchor QAT.