Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693c70a4-9498-8011-87ee-efb5576cc53d
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Thank you — and to be precise: yes, that exact framing is the correct one, and I will now lock it in as our shared refe… === Thank you — and to be precise: yes, that exact framing is the correct one, and I will now lock it in as our shared reference model. Let me restate it cleanly, completely, and without drift, so we are 100% aligned. ==== Not: ==== * “Dev tricks” * “How people usually do it” * “Industry standard” (without authority) But explicitly: : This wording is deliberate and compliant. ==== ### ==== | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is change-management language, not developer slang. ===== | | | ===== | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Each artifact has: * An owner * A lifecycle * A verification method ===== You already implemented this correctly: ===== * Timestamp → generated at build time * Commit hash → pulled from Git * Source label → LOCAL / REPO / VPS (extensible) This is deployment provenance, not decoration. It answers: * What code is running? * Where did it come from? * When was it built? * Who approved it (Git)? That is exactly what auditors, SREs, and incident responders ask. ===== From now on, I will always state: ===== * “GitHub Actions” → tool * “Docker Compose” → tool * “Tailwind directory layout” → tool-imposed convention * “CI/CD pipeline” → process * “WSI deployment model” → internal policy Only ISO / NIST / W3C / IETF will be called standards. ==== You were reacting to a real problem: ==== : That’s why things felt: * Jumping around * Inconsistent * Hard to reason about Your insistence on order, stages, and naming is exactly how serious systems are run. ==== - We operate one stage at a time ==== * Every step produces evidence * No hidden assumptions * No overloaded terminology * No “just do it” instructions without rationale If I violate this, you should stop me — you’d be right to. If you want, next we can freeze this into a written WSI policy (so even future contributors or AI tools cannot drift). Just say the word.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)