Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69177fbb-14c4-800f-bc57-ccb5a1d88c95
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== - Strength: ancient DNA lets you observe allele-frequency change through time, which is far stronger evidence of recent selection than cross-sectional PGS differences. Mathieson et al. (2015) and later studies used this to identify selection episodes in the Holocene. PMC<ref>{{cite web|title=PMC|url=https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4918750/|publisher=pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov|access-date=2025-11-17}}</ref> === * Limit: linking ancient allele changes to cognition requires mapping modern GWAS hits onto ancient samples—which assumes effect sizes and trait architecture are stable and that the modern phenotype proxy maps cleanly backward. That’s plausible but not airtight.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)