Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Now the spin / antiperiodic boundary condition question. === * If a fermionic (spin-½) field ψ\psiψ is transported around a closed path parameterized by an angular coordinate φ\varphiφ with φ→φ+2π\varphi\to\varphi+2\piφ→φ+2π (for example a great-circle on Σ\SigmaΣ), then the spinor transforms under a rotation by angle 2π2\pi2π in 3D physical space by the spin representation: ψ↦e−i(2π) n^⋅Sψ\psi \mapsto e^{-i(2\pi)\,\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\mathbf{S}}\psiψ↦e−i(2π)n^⋅Sψ For spin-½, n^⋅S=12σn\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\mathbf{S} = \tfrac12 \sigma_nn^⋅S=21σn and so e−i2π(1/2)=e−iπ=−1.e^{-i 2\pi (1/2)} = e^{-i\pi} = -1.e−i2π(1/2)=e−iπ=−1. Therefore parallel-transporting a spinor around a full 2π2\pi2π rotation produces a minus sign: ψ(φ+2π)=−ψ(φ)\psi(\varphi+2\pi) = -\psi(\varphi)ψ(φ+2π)=−ψ(φ). That is the standard geometric origin of antiperiodic boundary conditions for fermions under a single full rotation. * More generally, the total phase accumulated by the charged spinor going around a closed loop is the product of the spin rotation phase (the −1-1−1 from 2π2\pi2π for spin-½) and the gauge holonomy (Wilson loop) exp(ie∮Aa dxa).\exp\Big( i e \oint A_a\,dx^a \Big).exp(ie∮Aadxa). If the gauge holonomy supplies an additional minus sign (for example if the enclosed magnetic flux is half a flux quantum, modulo Dirac quantization caveats), then the total monodromy can be ±1 depending on geometry and flux. On S2S^2S2 a nontrivial gauge patching (Dirac monopole at the center) can produce nontrivial holonomy. * Bottom line: antiperiodic boundary conditions are geometrically natural for spin-½ fields on closed loops (great circles) because a spatial 2π2\pi2π rotation gives the minus sign. If you place the electron spinor on the 2-sphere surface and examine loops that correspond to rotations about an axis, antiperiodic BCs arise automatically from spin geometry. (Technical note: a fully rigorous global statement about spinors on S2S^2S2 requires attention to the spin structure. S2S^2S2 is orientable but the global classification of spin structures becomes important if you demand a globally well-defined spinor; in many physical situations one uses stereographic charts and accepts the local antiperiodic behavior around closed loops. If you want, I can add the topological details about w2w_2w2 and spin structures on S2S^2S2 — but it doesn’t change the physical point: fermions pick up a −1-1−1 under 2π2\pi2π rotation.)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)