Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695befc4-bd88-800c-8faa-3a817e670a41
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== ### ==== Nazi Germany: * Had formally declared war on multiple states * Was occupying foreign territory at scale * Was committing mass atrocities that were undeniable and ongoing * Had no nuclear weapons * Was already being fought militarily by peer powers The Allied invasion was continuation of an existing world war, not an intervention to remove a government. By contrast, the U.S.: * Is not in a declared total war against the world * Has not been invaded or militarily defeated * Retains global alliances and force projection * Possesses a nuclear triad There is no transition point from diplomacy to invasion that does not immediately trigger global catastrophe. ===== By 1944–45: ===== * Germany’s airspace was uncontested * Its economy was shattered * Its military command structure was collapsing * Its population was already under siege conditions Occupation followed defeat, not outrage. No analogous defeat condition exists for the U.S. — nor could one occur without nuclear escalation. ===== The WWII Allies: ===== * Had existential motivation * Were already mobilized * Accepted tens of millions of casualties as unavoidable * Had unified command structures No modern coalition: * is willing to absorb those losses, * would survive the economic shock, * or could coordinate militarily against the U.S. Even states that might rhetorically support “removal” would defect immediately when faced with real costs. ===== In WWII: ===== * Resistance movements mattered after invasion * External force determined outcomes In a nuclear-armed democracy: * External invasion delegitimizes internal opposition * Even anti-government citizens rally against foreign force * The military fractures unpredictably Foreign invasion would strengthen, not weaken, authoritarian consolidation. ===== The UN system exists largely because WWII-style resolutions were catastrophic. ===== One of its core implicit rules is: : Breaking that rule ends the international system itself. That’s why even: * Stalin’s USSR * Mao’s China * North Korea * Apartheid South Africa were isolated and pressured — not invaded for regime removal by the UN.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)