Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

===== - Credibility: - Repeatedly conflates confidence and detail with validity, treating numerical output as proof regardless of input bias. - Shifts between “math-based certainty” and “contextual exceptions” depending on which supports his claim at the moment. - Relies on hypothetical stacking of variables without empirical weighting or falsifiability. =====
* Behavioral Patterns: - Preprogrammed worldview reinforcement: Filters evidence through a fixed conclusion (cheating is rampant → therefore deaths imply cheating). - Context reframing: Retroactively redefines what questions were “really about” when challenged. - Defensive externalization: Attributes disagreement to bad faith, desperation, or personal attacks rather than addressing substance.
* Weaknesses: - Inconsistent standards of evidence (personal gameplay = proof; others’ analysis = “claims”). - Frequent logical slippage between presence of cheaters and personal encounter certainty.