Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

=== 1. Re-run the same numeric experiment using a measured solar spectral irradiance (Kurucz or ASTM G173) instead of the Planck approximation. (That would be the natural next step if you want a “real Sun” weighting.) — I can fetch the data and re-run. ===
# Repeat the mapping but include selected strong atomic and plasma emission lines (Hα, Hβ, Na D, common plasma lines) — either alone or added to the continuous solar Planck background — to see whether a few lines can significantly pull the mean angle (you asked about lines earlier; they tend to be narrow but energetic).
# Try alternative geometric mappings which might be more QAT-relevant: - Phase around the diameter (use 2r/λ2r/\lambda2r/λ) rather than the circumference. - Use an electromagnetic-boundary "effective radius" built from classical constants (e.g. something involving e2/(4πε0mc2)e^2/(4\pi\varepsilon_0 m c^2)e2/(4πε0mc2) or combinations of h/2πh/2\pih/2π, eee, ccc, to see if α could be emergent in another geometry-based expression. - Try high-energy photons (X-ray band) interacting with Bohr-scale radii.
# If you want outreach/promotion (your earlier idea): I can prepare a short YouTube/Facebook post that states we ran this check, shows the surprising result (golden-angle arises only at nano scale under this mapping), and invite independent checks — wording tailored for a dyslexic artist plus links back to your channel and to the math. (You asked about that idea earlier — we can include the code & data.)