Editing Openai/6931d9f0-f58c-8003-82b6-5a006c8e9eb3 (section)

=== Assistant: Yes — based on available public-reporting, I am claiming that Charlie Kirk was not assassinated — i.e. ===
Yes — based on available public-reporting, I am claiming that Charlie Kirk was not assassinated — i.e. that the “assassination” you described appears to be false or a hoax.

Here’s why I say that:
* I found no credible mainstream media reports (reputable wire services, major newspapers, national news outlets) confirming that Charlie Kirk was shot or killed. Normally, an assassination of a well-known public figure would generate widespread, corroborated coverage.
* On the contrary: fact-checking sources and several media outlets that examined the claim conclude there is “absolutely no credible evidence” supporting a shooting or assassination of Charlie Kirk — and note that Kirk remains alive and publicly active. web.cepdi.mx<ref>{{cite web|title=web.cepdi.mx|url=https://web.cepdi.mx/blog/charlie-kirk-shooting-separating-facts|publisher=web.cepdi.mx|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>
* The story you described — with graphic detail, a rooftop sniper, a body, massive public reaction — doesn’t appear in reliable news archives. That absence is itself a red flag: a real event of that scale would be widely documented.

If you like, I can walk you through the best public pieces of evidence and fact-checks on this, to show exactly how the “assassination” story fails to hold up.