Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== - I modeled the primary rainbow angle produced by a spherical water droplet as a function of wavelength (geometric-optics rainbow formula), using an approximate dispersion model for liquid water (a small Cauchy fit to typical n(λ) values taken from the literature). The primary-rainbow deviation for one internal reflection has a stationary (caustic) angle which we computed numerically for each wavelength. (Hale & Querry is the standard optical dataset for water — that is the physical basis for the dispersion values I used). PubMed<ref>{{cite web|title=PubMed|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20125343/|publisher=pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref> === * I weighted the wavelength-dependent rainbow angle with realistic spectral weightings: (A) a Planck black-body at 5800 K (Sun-like), and (B) Planck + several narrow emission lines (Hα 656.28 nm, Hβ 486.13 nm, Na D ~589.3 nm, He II 468.57 nm and a plasma coronal line Fe XIV 530.3 nm). The atomic/plasma line wavelengths are standard values from spectral databases (NIST). NIST<ref>{{cite web|title=NIST|url=https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Handbook/Tables/hydrogentable2.htm|publisher=physics.nist.gov|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref> * Result: with reasonable (but not extreme) line strengths the weighted mean primary-rainbow angle sits around ~138.33°. Adding narrow emission lines (the “line-pull” effect) moves the mean angle only by tiny amounts (fractions of a degree, typically << 1°). Using the Planck-only spectrum or Planck+lines produced only very small shifts between them. The basic conclusion: rainbow/spherical-water geometry + ordinary spectral weighting does not naturally produce 137.036… (1/α) or 137.508… (golden-angle) — the angles are larger (~138°) and the spectral line pull is tiny for realistic spectra. (Planck’s law was used for the continuum weighting.) Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2025-12-16}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)