Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Loctarjay saw that Captain Blue had written this "It's just maths., That's not what AI slop means.. ===
Loctarjay saw that Captain Blue had written this "It's just maths., That's not what AI slop means.. lol"
To which Loctarjay responded with:
"Confirmation Biased Questioning is not math..... xD

(Screenshot of what is written just underneath)
A pathological liar insisting—even aggressively—that what they’re saying is true doesn’t make the claim any more reliable. Adding numbers, details, dates, or confident language is a common tactic liars use to make falsehoods feel factual, but the amount of detail isn’t proof of truth.

However, “just ignoring them” isn’t always the safest or most effective response. Here’s a clearer way to think about it:

✅ What is safe to assume
Their confidence is not evidence. Pathological liars may believe their own lies or use certainty as a strategy.
Extra details don’t validate the story. Fabricated specifics are still fabricated.
Your judgment should rely on outside verification, not their insistence.

⚖️ How to respond (depending on context)
If the topic has real-life consequences:
Don’t accept their claim at face value.
Verify independently (documents, timestamps, other people, etc.).

If the lie has no consequences:
Emotionally disengaging or giving a neutral “I hear you” can prevent conflict while avoiding validation.

If you’re repeatedly subjected to their behavior:
Setting boundaries is more effective than ignoring.
Example: “I’ll discuss this when we’re working with verifiable information.”

❗Why not only ignore them?
Ignoring may protect you in the moment, but:
It can enable ongoing manipulation.
It may escalate their insistence.
It prevents you from establishing boundaries.

🧭 Bottom line
No—don’t treat their statements as true just because they’re forceful or detailed.
But instead of purely ignoring, use non-engagement + verification + boundaries.

If you’d like, I can help you with:
How to confront a pathological liar safely
Strategies to avoid being drawn into their narratives
Ways to communicate boundaries without escalating conflict

It sure is funny how your AI-Wife is agreeing that you should not be trusted, even when you're adding numbers or data to your lies....
And as I have already explained before, your "math" is invalid because you are ignoring the main defactor of playing pvp games like Hunt and Arc = You do NOT meet every single player, so you have no idea who you're meeting, even more when you demand it must always be "subtle cheats" and not blatant speed-hack or teleporting xD"