Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69177fbb-14c4-800f-bc57-ccb5a1d88c95
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 1. Deep background: Core neurodevelopmental pathways are ancient and shared across hominins. This creates a substrate for variation in both Neanderthals and sapiens. ===== # Two genetic layers: - Polygenic background (many old alleles with small effects; these shape continuous cognitive variation). - Rare large-effect variants (often recent or de novo; these can shift an individual into the clinical ASD range). # Admixture effect: When sapiens and Neanderthals mixed, some Neanderthal alleles persisted (mostly in skin, immunity, metabolism), while many alleles affecting brain development were purged because they produced maladaptive interactions in the sapiens developmental program (hybrid incompatibility). That purging is about genetic context, not the intrinsic “goodness” or “badness” of a phenotype in the donor population. # Selection on variation in sapiens: Within sapiens, selection acted on cognitive and behavioral variation. Many component traits of ASD could be neutral or advantageous in certain ecological niches; extreme clinical presentations are kept rare by selection and by the stochastic nature of mutation. # Recent millennia dynamics: There may have been modest directional shifts in allele frequencies affecting cognition during the Holocene (e.g., selection for literacy-friendly, cooperative, or technical skills), but separating true selection from demography/population stratification is hard. Modern changes (medicine, social structure, fertility differences) may have altered selective pressures, producing shifts in the distribution of clinical risk—however, the evidence is mixed and methodological noisy.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)