Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69651dc1-e168-8006-b56e-a23c6fb285ab
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Foucault was: ==== * Brilliant at diagnosing Western power * Weak at predicting what replaces it * Seduced by intensity, rupture, and “difference” * Blind to how sacred authority scales into coercion Many of his sharpest critics today argue that Iran was the moment where post-1968 anti-Enlightenment romanticism met reality—and lost. If you want, next we can: * Look at what Foucault’s feminist contemporaries said at the time * Compare this to today’s debates about “decolonial” or “anti-imperialist” alliances * Or examine whether this episode exposes a structural flaw in parts of continental philosophy Just tell me where you want to push the lens.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)