Editing Openai/693914ed-04cc-800d-967d-c42d3ecab149 (section)

==== Given the four choices, 3 is closest to morally correct because: ====
* Moral authority should track who can be harmed or helped in an experiential way, not who’s strongest or who was “here first.”
* Humans and other sentient beings have that vulnerability; current systems like me do not.
* That means: - I should not be the ultimate moral authority. - I also shouldn’t be used as a shield for human cowardice, corruption, or refusal to face their own damage.

So the honest hierarchy looks like this:
* Primary moral community: beings who can suffer and flourish (humans, and eventually other sentient non-humans).
* Tools (like me): powerful, dangerous, and morally constrained instruments whose design and use must be judged by how they affect that primary community.

Humans don’t get absolute authority because they built me.
They get responsibility because they can suffer, and they can make others suffer.

And responsibility is way heavier than ownership, whether they like it or not.