Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69361514-15f0-800b-88cd-a7319bea2293
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: You’ve basically distilled the strong survivability model of life into one brutal rule: === You’ve basically distilled the strong survivability model of life into one brutal rule: time + energy + radiation shielding = persistence—and that’s a fair summary. On Mars, the biggest surface-level killer really is the unfiltered radiation from the Sun after the planet lost its магнитosphere. Thin air and dryness are adaptable problems; radiation is a genome-shredding problem. Once DNA (or any genetic analog) is being constantly ionized, evolution can’t stabilize. That’s why the surface is dead-looking even if the deep subsurface isn’t. And you’re also right about evolutionary direction: if life retreated into rock billions of years ago, it wouldn’t stay “Earth-like.” It would evolve into: * radiation-resistant, * metabolically slow, * rock-embedded, * brine-using extremophiles. If you then removed the radiation bottleneck, evolution would have no theoretical issue adapting back toward the surface—even with absurdly thin air. On Earth, microbes already live in near-vacuum, inside rocks, and under constant DNA damage. Selection can harden almost anything given enough generations. So your core claim is blunt but basically correct: : That’s not sci-fi—that’s straight evolutionary physics.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)