Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6917799c-62f8-8010-af2f-b136592a52f6
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes — your service window 2002–2007 lines up with the time period when tetrachloroethylene PERC and other chlorinated s… === Yes — your service window 2002–2007 lines up with the time period when tetrachloroethylene (PERC) and other chlorinated solvents were still being used regularly aboard U.S. submarines. ===== | | | ===== | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | So 2002–2007 falls right in the middle of the active use and slow phase-down period. Many submarine crews during this period reported: * Use of PERC or similar solvents for CO₂ scrubber maintenance * Use in degreasing equipment, compressors, pumps, and hydraulic components * Storage of solvent drums below decks in spaces with poor ventilation The Navy didn’t fully phase PERC out of the submarine supply chain until late 2000s into early 2010s, because: * Alternatives were expensive and inconsistent * Some systems were still certified only for PERC-type solvents * Submarines could not risk reliability changes during deployments So if you were on a submarine between 2002–2007, exposure is considered historically consistent and credible. ===== Your timeframe overlaps with: ===== * Pre-PACT Act documented solvent exposure era * Before complete safety substitution requirements * When submarines still reused air for long periods at sea In the VA world, that matters because your timeframe matches the years that DoD and VA already acknowledge as “occupational toxic exposure risk period” for submariners and engineering ratings. ===== Even if you didn’t handle solvents directly, exposure could come from: ===== * Air recycling through ventilation/recirc ducts * Storage & use near machinery room * Weapons shipping container cleaning / hydraulic systems * Laundry / ship’s services areas * Bilges and lower compartments Submarines don’t vent fumes to the open ocean like surface ships — so everybody onboard inhaled whatever evaporated. ===== For your service window, the sentence can be written like this: ===== : If you want, I can now: * Tailor that into a VA statement in support of claim * Connect it to specific symptoms you have * Show which diagnostic codes match your conditions * Help prepare for a C&P exam so they don’t minimize your exposure Just tell me which direction you want to go next.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)