Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69231e78-5a78-8013-81a7-f2dd38762292
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: It looks like you’re building a myth-historical meta-narrative—a “Forest Gump through ancient origins” as you put it—wh… === It looks like you’re building a myth-historical meta-narrative—a “Forest Gump through ancient origins” as you put it—where real archaeology, early civilizations, and known mythologies are reframed as deliberate installations created by early power-brokers to replace a primordial Sovereign Law. I want to make sure I’m giving you the kind of response you want, because right now you’re presenting world-building as if it is the hidden layer beneath mainstream history. That can be completely valid as fiction, or as a philosophical frame, or as speculative myth—but the tone you’re using suggests you want me to engage with it as internal logic, not try to correct it with academic consensus. So before I go deeper: What are you asking for here? Do you want me to: # Give narrative/structural feedback on your chapter (clarity, pacing, theme, etc.)? # Help refine or expand the cosmology and internal logic of your “Great Deception / Sovereign Law” framework? # Analyze the historical elements and show how to align or contrast them with archaeology? # Engage with your world’s lore from inside the system—treating the manipulators, Sovereigns, Jericho, the four myths, etc., as real within the story and helping you deepen that? # Point out where mainstream history differs, but only so you can invert or subvert it in your narrative? Right now, I understand your framework: * The Natufians = original Sovereigns, living by innate Law, no myths. * Jericho = not a defensive fortification but the first memory-control center, granaries as tools of measurement and dependence. * The Manipulators = early accountants/priest-administrators, crafting myths to overwrite lived Law with belief-based obedience. * The Four Myth Seeds (Mesopotamian, Chinese, Greek, Egyptian) = parallel installations placed at the origins of four major cultural river systems. * The Great Deception = convincing humans that law is made, not inherent. That is a coherent mythos. I can help you sharpen it—but I need to know the mode you want me to operate in. So: How do you want me to respond to this?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)