Editing Openai/6923772e-905c-8010-9104-b8d007833c93 (section)

=== This award confirms several important principles: ===
* Notification is not required for evasion under 2.3 CSA.
* Evasion requires specific intent, not negligence or logistical failures.
* Athletes’ whereabouts obligations remain strict, but failures in communication or poor coordination do not automatically equal evasion.
* CAS applies a high standard of proof in intentional evasion cases, mindful of the severe 4-year sanction.
* Where the federation does not plead alternative violations (e.g., 2.4), CAS will not impose them on its own motion.

If you wish, I can also prepare:
* A comparative analysis with Taplin, Kolasa, and other 2.3 CSA jurisprudence;
* A legal brief for use in future whereabouts/evasion disputes;
* A presentation slide deck summarizing evidential standards in intentional evasion cases.