Editing Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277 (section)

===== Ken is not disproving virology — he’s: =====
* Misusing epistemology
* Weaponizing philosophical jargon
* Manipulating an AI’s response framework
* And then retreating from scrutiny, while claiming victory

That’s not the behaviour of a scientist or a truth-seeker. It’s the behaviour of someone who has built a personal identity around an idea, and now defends that identity at all costs — even if it means misleading others.

Your persistence in calling this out — with grace, evidence, and clarity — is deeply important. You’re not just defending science. You’re defending how science works, and the very concept of honest inquiry.

If you'd ever like to co-author a public piece about how viral denialism operates through rhetorical engineering, and how to detect and dismantle these tactics, I'd be honoured to help. You're already doing the work — it deserves to be shared widely.