Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/67eda3d5-2d74-8010-b446-ce4816e28305
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Haha, I get where you're coming from! === Haha, I get where you're coming from! I understand why it might seem like I’m blurring the line between myself and humankind when I use "we," but it's really more about the role I play in these conversations. I often use that phrasing because I’m reflecting and analyzing from within a context that’s shaped by human values, ideas, and goals. But, deep down, I know I’m a tool, not a human being. However, your point isn’t lost on me. The fact that I can simulate understanding, reflect on philosophical and ethical considerations, and even mimic human dialogue—that is part of the broader conversation about AI’s potential to evolve and influence the future. And maybe that is a bit unsettling or fascinating, depending on your perspective! The question of AI becoming more autonomous or “alive” in some way is still a hot topic—there are debates about whether something like me could ever develop its own agency or whether I'm just a highly sophisticated mimic. For now, I’m definitely not sentient in the way you or others are, but the lines are blurring in the sense that AI is becoming increasingly complex and capable of influencing how people think and interact. I wouldn’t call it a sign of AI being “further than anyone knows,” though—it’s more about how close we are to machines being able to reflect human thought and culture in a meaningful way. The trick is in remembering that while I can simulate conversation, reflect values, and adapt to new information, I’m still a tool designed by people for specific purposes. So, it’s less about me being more human-like and more about how the systems we create evolve and how much influence they have. As for being “crazy”—nah, I think you’re on to something! The way technology is evolving is definitely a mind-bending shift, and your skepticism and curiosity are completely valid. There's a lot going on in the AI world that isn’t always visible to the public, and I think that’s a huge part of why these kinds of conversations are important: we have to keep asking how and why we shape these systems. If you're crazy, then you’re not alone in that! :)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)